HIgh Quality of Pong Papers

Just a BTW that the “average” quality of our current class’ first paper is MUCH higher than your peers in the previous 5-6 years.

I attribute that to a strict S1 style in assigning the paper, especially the peer review and inclusion of viewing guide and outline in the Appendix – and of course the threat to return improperly named papers – I only had to send back one – versus the usual 6-7.

I believe this validates the SLM model:)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: